Pakistan Case Law← Search
1989 SCMR 1490

RAILWAY WORKERS' UNION OPEN LINE ESTABLISHMENT vs NATIONAL

Citation1989 SCMR 1490
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No,132 of 1984
Date1989-02-22
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Dr. Javed Iqbal, Syed Usman Ali Shah
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought, against the dismissal by the High Court, of a Constitutional petition. It had arisen out of a referendum result which amongst others was to determine the Collective Bargaining Agent (C.BA.), in Pakistan Railways' Open Line Establishment (O.L.E.).

2. ' The dispute has long history. The petitioner had lost in the final referendum on account of a fairly wide margin of votes. Their complaint, amongst others, was that legitimate voters were not included in the final list of voters. The High Court in a very elaborate judgment after conceding some of the points raised from the petitioner's side had amongst others come to the conclusion that the difference of votes was such that the writ in the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, would not issue in favour of the petitioner. We have heard the learned counsel from both sides. To be fair to the learned counsel for the petitioner he stated that although a long period has elapsed between the last referendum and the next referendum, which is yet to take place, and the administration concerned being cognizant of this aspect of the matter, is already exmaining various features thereof for holding the referendum. He also very frankly stated that there are some practical difficulties in arranging a referendum in the Open Line Establishment. He has also taken the position that the defacto C.BA. Having been a party to various agreements, the petitioner would not at this stage disturb the status quo as the next referendum is now in sight. He, however, contended that certain clarifications are essential for the future guidance in respect of the holding of the referendum and the results thereof.

3. ' After hearing both the learned counsel and noticing that they do not materially disagree in this behalf, we make the following observations with their consent:-

(a) That the list of voters for the referendum must be brought up-to-date before the referendum in such a manner that it should include all fresh entries up to a few months before the referendum.

4. The period can be about 3 to 6 months keeping in view the fact that the referendum is for Open Line Establishment which extends to far off places involving difficulties of communications.

(b) That the question whether a certain defect affects the referendum or not with a view to set it aside in its entirety, will depend upon the circumstances of each case and situation; and it is not a universal rule that whenever there is wide margin of votes between the winning and the losing party the referendum shall not be set aside for this reason alone.

5. ' With the foregoing observations this petition stands disposed of.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search