' The appellant along with four others was tried in the Court of Sessions Judge, Muzaffargarh, for having formed an unlawful assembly on 13-7-1972 and caused the death of Bashir Ahmad and injured Muhammad Anwar, P.W. The trial Court convicted the appellant under section 304, Part II of the P.P.C. And sentenced him to undergo R.I. For seven years with a fine of Rs,2_000 or in default of payment to undergo R.I. For one year. The fine, if realized, was to be paid to the legal heirs of he deceased by way of compensation under section 544-A of the Cr.P.C.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has not challenged the conviction of the appellant and has merely prayed for reduction of the sentence to the one already undergone. The learned counsel for tile State has no objection to the same. In this connection, the learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that the appellant had caused injuries to the deceased as he was going to commit rape with his wife and that he had not acted in a cruel manner. There are only four injuries on the body of the deceased, while the appellant had himself received five injuries in attempting to rescue his wife. The appellant was arrested on 16-7-1972 and was allowed bail in the month of May, 1974. He was convicted A on 9-9-1976 and his sentence was suspended on 20-1- 1977. In this way, the appellant remained confined in the jail as under trial prisoner for one year and ten months and as convict for four months and eleven days. If benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. Is given to the appellant, then he has already served out two years two months and eleven days of his sentence. Relying on the case of Arif Shah v. The State 1977 SCMR 33, the learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellant be not sent back to jail after a long period of more than 12 years since the grant of bail to him. Agreeing with the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, I allow benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. To the B appellant, uphold the conviction of the appellant and reduce his sentence to the one already undergone. The appeal is partly allowed with the modification in the sentence as mentioned above. The sentence of fine is remitted. .