' SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.-- The petitioner was serving in a private school when the educational institutions were nationalised. The petitioner claims that he had a Master's degree and was drawing pay of Rs,400 when he was inducted into the government service consequent upon the nationalisation. In accordance with the relevant rules he was entitled to one advance increment in the scale in which his pay was fixed. The grievance of the petitioner is that this benefit was initially granted to him but was later illegally withdrawn. He filed an appeal before the Service Tribunal but it was dismissed. He now seeks leave to appeal from this Court.
2. In support of this petition it is contended that while dismissing his appeal the learned Tribunal has not considered the facts of his case at all. On going g through the judgment of the learned Tribunal we find substance in the contention of the petitioner. Leave to appeal is granted. Security for costs in the sum of Rs,1,000. The appeal may be made ready for hearing on the present record with permission to the parties to file additional documents, if any. During the C pendency of the appeal, no recovery on account of the amount already paid to him, be made.