DECISION This is an appeal against an award of the learned Presiding Officer of Sind Labour Court No. 11, Karachi, dated May 23, 1973, whereby the learned Labour Court dismissed the application of the appellant, filed under section 25-A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 (hereinafter called the Ordinance), for re-instatement in service or in the alternative for ' the return of the deposit of Rs.
500.00. The appellant had committed misappropriation of certain amounts e: money. The respondent, it is alleged, told him to either face criminal prosecution or resign. The appellant resigned. It is the case of the appellant that because of the intervention of certain persons, the respondent agreed to take him back on the condition that he will deposit Rs. 500.00 as Cash Security. The appellant did so.
2. The respondent did not cross-examine the appellant. Therefore, whatever, the appellant stated in his affidavit must be taken to be true It appears to me that the respondent agreed to take back the appellant in service, if he deposited Rs: 500.00 as Cash Security. For some reason or the other, the respondent changed his mind to take back the appellant in service. Their being only a breach of the agreement between the appellant and the respondent to take leek the former in service, it would not be a matter for which the appellant could get relief under section 25-A of the Ordinance.
The appellant, however, would be entitled to the refund of Rs. 500.00, which he deposited as security. Mr. Shaukat A. Nanji, the learned representative for the respondent, contended that this Court has no jurisdiction to order the refund of Rs. 500.00. The appellant must pay court-fees and go to the civil Court. I do not think that, there I much force in this contention. Section 25-A of the Ordinance should not be given a -narrow interpretation so as to deprive a workman of his jot claim. I would order that the respondent should refund Rs. 500.00 to the appellant within two weeks.