1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by the vendees' side in a pre- emption matter against the dismissal of their Regular First Appeal by the High Court.
2. ' Learned counsel contended that the High Court dismissed the appeal without summoning the record; that the question of ownership of estate was wrongly decided; and, the price of the land was also wrongly determined.
3. ' The tenor of the judgment of the High Court and the contents of para. 5 thereof in particular where documents exhibited before the lower Court were referred to, are indicative of the fact that the record must have been formally summoned by the Court or it was made available to it for the purposes of the disposal of the appeal. The first point raised by the learned counsel, therefore, fails.
4. The other points are of fact.
5. We have heard the learned counsel at some length and examined the material relied upon by him; but do not find any justification for interference with the impugned judgment. Leave to appeal accordingly is refused.