Pakistan Case Law← Search
1989 PLC (C.S.) 872

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ QURESHI vs GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and another

Citation1989 PLC (C.S.) 872
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petitions Nos. 1541 and 1542 of 1989
Date1989-04-15
Judge(s)Irshad Hasan Khan
ResultPetitions dismissed

ORDER

' This order shall dispose of Writ Petitions Nos. 1541 and 1542 of 1989, involving identical questions of law and facts.

2. Briefly, the facts are that the petitioners are Veterinary Officers in the Directorate of Poultry Research Institute, Rawalpindi. They were transferred on 27-12-1987 to the Veterinary Institute, Lahore Cantonment, purely on temporary basis against leave vacancies up to 31-10-1988. As a result of the economy measure, salary budget was withdrawn by the Punjab Government and all the officers working in the leave vacancies were ordered to be repatriated to the parent department including the petitioners. The petitioners did not comply with the Punjab Government's orders by relinquishing the charge of the post held by them at the Veterinary Research Institute, Lahore, and instead invoked the Constitutional jurisdiction of this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners' case has been misunderstood by the departmental authorities while giving report to this Court, inasmuch as, the petitioners are not interested to continue to work on temporary basis in the Veterinary Research Institute, Lahore Cantonment. Their grievance is that these vacancies of Rewarch Veterinary Officers occurred at veterinary Research Institute, Lahore, during the period from December, 1987 to ugly, 1988. Six Officers, namely, Dr. Khawar Mehboob, Dr. Mateen Qadri, Dr. Amar Raza Khan, Dr. Shuaib Anwar and Dr. Anwarul Haq have been posted as eterinary Officers (Research) but the petitioners were ignored notwithstanding the fact that they are senior to them.

4, Learned counsel also argued that the petitioners have not been appointed to the post of Research Officer for ulterior motive with a view to accommodate the two appointees, namely, Dr. Shuaib Anwar and Dr. Ikramul Haq who were ad hoc employees. Initially, their names were never recommended by the Public Service Commission for this Institute, notwithstanding that the Government issued Notification for their appointment to this Institute.

5. The contentions have no force. It is an admitted fact that the post presently held by the petitioners as Veterinary Officers (Research) in their parent department is of the same grade and equivalent to the post of Veterinary Officer (Research) in the Institute by all standards. The petitioners have, therefore, no vested right to claim a post of their own choice merely on the basis of seniority. This is purely an administrative matter which is not open to challenge in the circumstances of the present case.

6. It is next contended that the order of petitioners' repatriation is bad in law, inasmuch as, the Directorate of Federal Research Institute has no jurisdiction to repatriate them. The Secretary, Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Government of Punjab, alone was competent to repatriate them.

7. The contention is untenable. As pointed out above, as a result of economy measure, the salary budget was withdrawn by the Punjab Government and all Officers working in the leave vacancies were ordered to be repatriated to the parent department. This order is equally applicable to the petitioners.

8. In view of the above, I find no force in the writ petitions which are hereby dismissed in limine.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search