' ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, J.--This is a petition for leave to appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge of the Peshawar High Court, Circuit Bench Abbottabad, dated 2nd July, 1988.
2. This is a second time that the petitioner has approached this Court. His first round of litigation culminated in the judgment of this Court reported as Muhammad Fareedun v. The State 1987 SCM R 1962. As per the direction of this Court the learned Sessions Judge, Mansehra, took up the matter and after considering the pros and cons rejected the application of the petitioner vide order, dated 12-3-1988. Leave to appeal sought by the petitioner in the High Court too has been refused through the impugned order.
3. We have heard the petitioner who argued his case in person. He referred us to the various provisions of law in support of his case but to his misfortune none of the witnesses has given any statement in Court under oath. The statements of some of the witnesses, particularly those of Bara Khan and Mst. Samina, were either recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. Or not on oath or solemn affirmation. Therefore, they cannot be proceeded against for perjury.
4. The petition has thus no merit and is hereby dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.