1. ' C.M.P.No, 8-R of 1987 ' NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.--For the reasons given in the petition for restoration, the order dated 19-12- 1987 dismissing the netition for non-prosecution is recalled and the petition restored to its original number. Let the same be heard today.
2. ' C. P. No,164-R of 1987 ' The petitioner was compulsorily retired by order dated 2-1-1985 but he did not challenge the same by a departmental appeal, till 3-9-1986, although he could file it only by 1-2-1985. Hence the appeal was dismissed as barred by time. The reason given for filing the appeal with so much delay was that the petitioner did not think that any useful purpose would be served by filing an appeal so long as the appellate authority (I.G.Police) during whose period he was compulsorily retired was not transferred as he did not expect any relief from the said Inspector-General of Police.
3. This explanation was not considered to be satisfactory by the Service Tribunal and the appeal before it was dismissed on the short ground that no fault could be found in the order of the appellate authority.
4. ' We entirely agree with the above view of the Service Tribunal. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.