1. ' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--The petitioner who has been now ousted from a portion of the Quarter No, 5/336, Liaquatabad, seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Sind dated 11- 11-1986 whereby her Revision Petition, against the concurrent findings of the two Courts, was dismissed with costs.
2. ' The respondent Aziz Khan sued in 1968 the husband of the petitioner for getting possession of the aforesaid portion of the Quarter which according to him had been handed over to the husband of the petitioner as a licensee, being his relative. The husband of the petitioner pleaded joint purchase of the Quarter or in the alternative adverse possession over it or an irrevocable licence under which he had invested in the superstructure. Issues were framed but on facts all were decided against the petitioner and the respondent was granted a decree of possession and mesne profits. The Appeal failed and so did the Revision.
3. ' The petitioner personally appeared before us and sought to advance her case of an oral purchase of the site from the plaintiff-respondent and his subsequent refusal to reduce the transaction to writing.
4. We have examined the record and find that the concurrent finding of facts recorded by the two Courts below does not suffer from any such infirmity or deficiency as could have justified the High Court in reopening the issues in a Revision Petition under section 115 C.P.C. No merit is found and hence leave to appeal is refused.