1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--A dispute regarding demarcation and identity of two properties adjacent to each other, belonging to the two parties in this case, was resolved in the first round of litigation initiated by the respondent, in his favour through an ex parte decree against the petitioner.
2. The petitioner/judgment-debtor in that litigation filed appeal which was dismissed, but during the pendency of that appeal she had filed a civil suit challenging the ex parte decree on grounds including fraud, misrepresentation, illegalities and errors of jurisdiction. This suit was dismissed as time-barred. Her appeal and revision have also, accordingly, been dismissed. Thus, the petitioner has failed in the two litigations throughout without so far having been able to avail of the opportunity to defend herself against the claim of the respondent, on merits.
3. After hearing the learned counsel, we consider it a fit case to examine whether in the circumstances of this case the petitioner's suit in the second round, was barred by time.
4. ' Leave to appeal, accordingly, is granted. Security Rs, 2,000.
5. ' The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties to file all necessary documents. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.