1. ' GHULAM MUJADDID, J.-- This case was taken up on its turn. Counsel for the petitioner was absent; Advocate-on-Record present. The latter submitted that he informed the former that the case was fixed for hearing today. In spite of that the counsel has not turned up. We have not received any request for adjournment from the counsel but the Advocate-on-Record insisted for an A adjournment.
2. ' We are not inclined to do so because the matter pertains to the year 1983.
3. ' So we examined the record called for by order dated 20-1-88, also perused the impugned judgment as well as other relevant orders.
4. Learned Judge as well as Letters Patent Bench of the High Court rightly observed regarding the laches Even, otherwise, the matter stands concluded by finding of fact of the Settlement Commissioner that the property in dispute (SW.III-24-S-8, Ramnagar, Lahore) was meant for residential purposes being situated in a part of the town which was initially residential.
5. ' The Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner transferred the entire property to respondent No, 1 on the ground that he was a claimant whereas the other side was a non-claimant.
6. ' It is not a fit case for grant of leave. Dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.