' MUHAMMAD AFZAL AULLAH, J.--Both the parties are sisters inter se. Their father made the disputed will in favour of the respondent.The petitioner succeeded before the lower two Courts in avoiding the effect of the will but failed before the High Court in a Civil Revision, filed by the respondent.
2. The questions; whether the disputed will was made in resondent's favour and whether the petitioner had consented to it at the revelent time now stand concluded by findings of fact.The findings in this behalf get support from the fact that the petitioner kept silent about it for nearby about a quarter of century. To us also, it appears that she had consented to it. No justification has been made out for interference. Leave to appeal is refused.