Pakistan Case Law← Search
1989 MLD 3058

Mir AKBAR KHAN vs COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE And LAND CUSTOMS And

Citation1989 MLD 3058
CourtLahore High Court
Judge(s)Rustam S. Sidhwa
ResultPetition partly accepted

This is a constitutional petition filed by Mir Akbar, petitioner, calling in question the illegal seizure of Bed Ford Truck No. MR-2533.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner's Bed Ford Truck No. M R 2533 was seized at Kohat Check Post on 15th February, 1968, as it happened contain two new tyres which were mounted. Being aggrieved by the illegal seizure, the petitioner preferred a writ petition in the High Court, which is now before me for disposal.

3. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Customs Authorities. Unfortunately, the original tile of the case is untraceable and the case per force will have to be dealt with on this basis. In the absence of the file, learned counsel for the respondents is not able to show whether the Bed Ford Truck in Pakistan was doing regular trips across the border or occasional trips. In these circumstances, the case will have to proceed on the basis that it was doing local trips within the country, as it was seized in Kohat. In the absence of the file, the respondents are not able to show that the two new tyres which were mounted on the Bed Ford truck were smuggled tyres, or those which were bona fide purchased from the local market without knowledge of their being smuggled. In these circumstances, the seizure of the Bed Ford truck at least is illegal, though perhaps the Customs may adjudicate into the question whether the two new tyres were smuggled or not and, if so, what action can be taken thereon. It may be stated here that the Bed Ford truck in question was released by the Customs against a bond, just after this writ petition was admitted.

4. In view of the above, this writ petition is partly accepted and the seizure of the Bed Ford Truck No. MR-2533 is declared to have been made without lawful authority and is set aside. Since the truck in question is presently with the petitioner, the bond submitted by the petitioner stands discharged.

Nothing herein contained shall prevent the respondents from adjudicating into the case as regards the two new tyres which were found in the truck.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

H.B.T./M-1253/L

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search