1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--The decision of the High Court in its writ jurisdiction in a settlement matter involving two serious factual controversies--one relating to the identity of the disputed property and the other to its availability for transfer, has been challenged on two grounds: (a), that the High Court should not have held the detailed inquiry for rendering findings of fact in its writ jurisdiction; and (b) that the findings are incorrect, on both aforestated questions.
2. After hearing both the learned counsel at length we are satisfied that the High Court held the detailed inquiry with the consent of both the parties. On the second question we are satisfied that the findings by the High Court do not suffer from any infirmity of law or principle.This petition for leave to appeal, accordingly, is dismissed.