Pakistan Case Law← Search
1989 SCMR 1329(2)

MANZUR AHMAD and 7 others vs ABDUL KHALIQ and 7 others

Citation1989 SCMR 1329(2)
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No,791 of 1984
Date1988-09-10
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Saad Saood Jan
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by the plaintiffs in a suit regarding inheritance in a case of Evacuee Land Settlement against dismissal of their civil revision by the High Court.

2. ' The petitioners Nos.1 to 7 claim to be the children of Din Muhammad a predeceased son of Sardar Muhammad a displaced person right-holder. It appears that they were given the share, which as heirs they would have inherited in some land but were denied the same right in respect of other property. They were compelled to file the civil suit but without any success. It was held that Sardar Muhammad, having died on 27-8-1950, the Family Laws Ordinance promulgated on 15-7-1961 could not by virtue of section 4 thereof, be of any assistance to them.

3. ' An appeal before the District Court was not entertained and its memorandum was returned on account of jurisdictional evaluation. The High Court, having entertained a revision petition dismissed the same affirming the trial Court's view namely that the 1961 Ordinance being not retrospective, the petitioners were not entitled to any relief as grand-children of Sardar Muhammad.

4. ' After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners who has relied on Iqbal Mai v. Falak Sher PLD 1986 SC 228 and other judgments of the superior Courts and the learned counsel for the respoadents, who has cited Muhammad Ali v. Abdul Aziz 1980 S CM R 267 we consider it a fit and proper case to grant leave to appeal inter alia to examine the following questions:--

(a) Whether the property, being Evacuee, the petitioners would not be entitled to the relief claimed, by virtue of para.46 of the Rehabilitation Scheme;

(b) Whether the Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 read with other connected laws would not be given such effect so as to entitle the petitioners in this case to inherit the estate left by Sardar Muhammad.

5. ' In this context the question of retrospectively would also need reexamination.

6. ' Leave to appeal, is accordingly granted. Security Rupees 5,000.

7. ' The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties to file all necessary documents.

8. ' Stay order dated 10-10-1984 to continue meanwhile.

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search