1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by the legal representatives of an allottee of State land against the dismissal by the High Court of their writ petition filed against the resumption of the land.
2. ' The two main reasons for the resumption were: (a) non-cultivation of the land upto the prescribed percentage of area within the prescribed time; (b) non-cultivation of the prescribed food crops.
3. ' It is not denied that the relevant scheme did lay down the requisite conditions. Learned counsel, however, has raised some technical contentions and the main contention is that the conditions were satisfied and further that the orders impugned before the High Court were based on misreading of relevant material.
4. After hearing the learned counsel at some length, we do not agree with him that the question of misreading before the High Court was not properly dealt with in the impugned judgment. Not only this, the relevant crop inspection register entry was also examined by the High Court and the same was found against the petitioners' contention. The controversy it is clear, now stands concluded by findings of fact against the petitioners, which do not suffer from any infirmity. Leave to appeal, therefore, is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.