' ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, J.--This is a petition for leave to appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, dated 13-6-1988.
2. The respondents' predecessor-in-interest had mortgaged certain lands through mutation attested on 29-8-1923 at the hands of the predecessor-ininterest of the petitioners. On 21-11-1983 the respondents moved an application before the Collector, Shahpur, for redemption of the mortgage. This application was rejected on 28-4-1984 holding that the same was barred by time.
The appeal of the respondents was also dismissed by the Additional Commissioner (Revenue) on 31-10-1984. On being approached, the learned Member, Board of Revenue, Punjab, accepted the revision petition of the respondents and allowed the redemption. The writ petition of the petitioners has also been dismissed through the impugned order.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the orders of the Board of Revenue and that of the learned Single Judge and are of the view that the orders impugned before us are unexceptionable in that it has rightly been held that the application for redemption was in time.
4. Finding no force the petition is dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.