Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1989 P Cr. L J 2354

ATTAR KHAN vs THE STATE

Citation1989 P Cr. L J 2354
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No, 163/B of 1989
Date1989-05-30
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar
ResultBail granted

ORDER

1. ' The petitioner has been arrested in case F.I.R. No, 302, dated 5-7-1973, Police Station Khushab, under section 302/34, P.P.C.

2. 2.The FIR. Was lodged by Ghulam Muhammad. He had not named the petitioner as an accused in the F.I.R. However, during the investigation the police came to the conclusion that out of the three persons named in the F.I.R., two were innocent while three other persons including the petitioner, had participated in the occurrence. Iqbal and Fattu who were found to have participated alongwith the petitioner in the occurrence, and the accused named in the F.I.R. Were challaned. They were tried and acquitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sargodha vide order, dated 17-2-1977. The only witness who had appeared before the police to make statement against the petitioner and Iqbal and Fattu, who alongwith him, were found to have participated in the occurrence, apart from the accused named in the F.I.R. Was Muhammad Rafiq. According to the Investigating Officer the petitioner alongwith five others had made confession before him of having committed the murder.

3. This Muhammad Rafiq had appeared at the trial and had not supported the prosecution case. He was declared hostile.

4. 3.The petitioner after his arrest moved a petition for bail before the Sessions Judge. At that stage also Muhammad Rafiq swore an affidavit that the petitioner had not made any confession before him.

5. ' In the circumstances, enumerated above, reasonable grounds do not appear at this stage of the petitioner being involved in the said case. He, therefore, cannot be refused bail merely on account of having allegedly absconded. This petition is, therefore, allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, provided he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs, Twenty thousand with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Khushab.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch