Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
K.L.R 1989 Criminal Cases 688

ATTA MUHAMMAD ETC. vs THE STATE

CitationK.L.R 1989 Criminal Cases 688
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Cr.Misc. No.1892-B-1989,
Date1989-06-28
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar
ResultN/A

ORDER

Sardar Muhammad Dogar, J.- Petitioners seek bail in the case registered against them and others at Police Station Musakhel, district Mianwali on 26-7-88 under Section 302/307/148/149 PPC.

2. According to F.I.R, the petitioners while armed with guns had fired shots at the complainant, along with Muhammad Nawaz accused on the lalkara raised by Muhammad Hayat and Shah Jehan their co-accused. None of the shots fired, however, struck the complainant. Mst. Daulat Kliatoon asister of the complainant who stepped forward to save the complainant, was struck by the shot fired by Muhammad Nawaz, as a resuIt of which she fell down and died later.

Motive for the occurrence was civil litigation between the parties.

3. Bail is being sought by the petitioners on the grounds that they are Military personnel and had not participated in the occurrence; that even according to the prosecution the shots alleged to have fired by them, had neither struck the deceased nor any of the P.Ws.; that aIthough guns were planted on them yet the said guns had not tallied with any empty, and that they are in jail since after their arrest but the case has not been fixed for trial so far. ,

4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the grant of bail on ( the ground that their participation in the occurrence shows that they had , common intention to commit the crime.

5. It appears from the F.I.R, that the shots allegedly fired by the petitioners had not struck anyone.

Two of their co-accused Shah Jehan and Muhammad Hayat who also had not caused injuries either to the deceased or to the P.Ws, already stand released on bail. They are in jail since after their arrest but the case has not been fixed for trial so far, nor, is, there any possibility of the same being fixed for trial in the near future.

In the circumstances, a case for bail appears to have been made out. This petition is, therefore, allowed and the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, provided they furnish bail bonds in the sum of Rs. Twenty thousand each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Asstt. Commissioner, Mianwali.

Copy dasti on payment of usual charges.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch