1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought against an order passed by the High Court in its writ jurisdiction whereby the petitioner's Constitutional petition was disposed of in the light of the relief sought by the petitioner and the consent given from the respondent's side. The relevant part of the order reads as follows-- "In view of the above, I direct that the trial Court shall ask the concerned officers of the two banks to produce the relevant record with sources, if any, of remittances on such a date/dates so that this case is decided before the end of October, 1984. The parties shall appear before the Court on 8th July, 1984. The Court shall also allow the parties to produce any evidence in rebuttal. This petition with the above direction shall stand disposed of with no order as to costs."
2. When questioned as to what is the grievance left with regard to the direction sought from and issued by the High Court as contained in the above reproduced .Part of the order, the petitioner stated that he would face certain technical difficulties with regard to the production of the entire record. The apprehension is unsubstantiated as the High Court's directions relate to the production of the "relevant record". That being so, no case has been made out for leave to appeal. The same, therefore, is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.