Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1989 MLD 4023

ALLAH RAKHA And Another vs THE STATE

Citation1989 MLD 4023
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1319/B of 1989
Date1989-04-29
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

Petitioners seek bail in the case registered at Police Station Satiana, District Faisalabad on 15-7- 1988 under section 302/307/148/149, P.P.C. Read with section 109, P.P.C.

2. The detailed facts given in the F.I.R. Stand incorporated in the order passed by this Court on 30-1- 1989 in a petition for bail filed by co-accused of the petitioners. The same need not be repeated in extenso. Only relevant parts assigned to the petitioners are being mentioned in this order.

3. In the occurrence, apart from Abdul Sattar, Mukhtar Ahmad and Muhammad Nawaz P.Ws., their companion Abdul Aziz (deceased) was done to death. Abdul Aziz was found to have suffered two injuries. Abdul Sattar P.W. Was noted to have suffered four injuries. Mukhtar Ahmad and Muhammad Nazir P.Ws. Were noted to have suffered 5 and 3 injuries respectively. While from accused side, Allah Rakha petitioner had suffered 11 injuries and his brother Maqbool co-accused had suffered 7 injuries.

4. The doctor who had examined Mukhtar Ahmad P.W. Had kept the injury on the hand under observation. While declaring the same grievous after X-ray examination he opined that the same appeared to have been caused by a blunt weapon.

Learned counsel for the petitioners in this respect stated at the Bar that the P.Ws. Also later during investigation had explained that the said injury was caused with the butt of gun.

5. The summed up position is, that although one of the persons on the complainant side had died, yet the total injuries suffered by the accused side are more in number than that of the complainant side. The complainants themselves did not deny having caused injuries to Allah Rakha petitioner and his brother Maqbul co-accused although they stated that by way of explanation. They are in jail for the last about nine months. As noted earlier, except the injury on the hand of Mukhtar Ahmad P.W., the other injuries alleged to have been caused by both the petitioners to said two P.Ws. Were declared simple. With regard to injury declared grievous also there is a contradiction in the F.I.R. And the opinion of the doctor about the weapon used for that.

SA./A-696/L

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch