Pakistan Case Law← Search
1989 SCMR 928

ABDUR REHMAN BABAR vs N.W.F.P. through the Chief Secretary, Government

Citation1989 SCMR 928
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Constitutional Petition No, 128-R of 1988
Date1989-02-08
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Ali Hussain Qazilbash
ResultLeave to appeal granted

ORDER

1. ' NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.--The charge against the petitioner was that "while serving as Tehsildar, Abbottabad, during 1979 (he) attested Mutation Nos. 9415, 9416 and 9417 is respect of the land situated in village Sheikh-ul-Bandi, about which Notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was already issued and announcement of final award made on 14-12-1978 i.e, in clear violation of revenue laws".

2. ' After departmental proceedings the petitioner was compulsorily retired from service. His appeal to the Service Tribunal having failed he has moved this Court seeking leave to appeal.

3. ' The plea of the petitioner before the Service Tribunal mainly was that he being newly posted in the locality was not, in fact, aware of the award made by the Land Acquisition Collector and that he had attested the mutations in routine. This plea, however, did not find favour with the Service Tribunal on the ground that the petitioner being the incharge of the Tehsil Office was supposed to know the acquisition of the area under reference and more particularly so when he was the Revenue Officer of the Circle in question.

4. However, no attention was given by the Service Tribunal to the circumstance that several other persons who were guilty of similar defaults were imposed minor penalties and that the punishment imposed upon the petitioner was out of all proportion with the misconduct committed, if any.

5. ' This aspect of the case requires further consideration. Leave granted.

6. ' The appeal shall be made ready on the present record, with liberty to the parties to add further documents, if any and put up for hearing at a very early date.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search