' The learned Family Court has decreed the suit of the respondent No,1 for dissolution of marriage on three grounds, viz. Khula, non-maintenance of the respondent No,1 by the petitioner and cruelty and maltreatment of the respondent No,l. The contention of Mr.K.M.Nadeem, learned counsel for the petitioner, is that the impugned Judgment is not based on sufficient evidence as the respondent No,1 had failed to establish any one of the three grounds. In regard to Khula, the contention of Mr.Nadeem is that the same cannot be granted without return of the benefits which she has received from the husband and since no such benefits were returned to the petitioner, the order of the learned Family Court suffered from infirmity.
2. The argument of Mr.Nadeem would have been valid if the suit has not been decreed on two other grounds, since besides Khula, the dissolution of marriage was sought on two other grounds viz., non-maintenance and cruelty. In this respect, the contention of Mr.Nadeem is that the evidence adduced by the respondent No,1 was not sufficient to establish the said grounds. However, the argument is unacceptable as assessment of evidence was the function of the trial Court and this Court in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction cannot enter into the realm of facts. Apart from this no other grounds has been pleaded. I, therefore, do not find force in this petition and dismiss the same in limine. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.