Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1987 MLD 1743

S.M.K. LODHI vs THE STATE

Citation1987 MLD 1743
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No, 44/T of 1987
Date1987-05-04
Judge(s)Sh. Ijaz Nisar
ResultPetition allowed

ORDER

' This is an application under section 528, Cr.P.C. For the transfer of case the State v. S.M.K. Lodhi under section 514, Cr.P.C. From the Court of Rao Iqbal Ahmed Khan, Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Lahore.

2. Briefly stated the facts are that S.M.K. Lodhi, Advocate stood surety for one Zafar Khan who was involved in a case under section 165-A, P.P.C. He absented from the Court as a result of which proceedings under section 514, Cr.P.C. Were initiated against the petitioner. The learned Special Judge issued non-bailable warrants of Arrest against him.

3. Transfer is sought on the grounds that there was no justification or the issuance of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner and he at the most could have been required to pay the :mount of bond. It is next submitted that the learned trial Court did of permit the petitioner to submit written applications explaining the position nor is allowing appearance of the counsel on behalf of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the learned Special Judge is a complainant against-the petitioner before the Punjab Bar Council.

4. Report and comments were called from the learned Special Judge, Anti-Corruption. He admits the issuance of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner under section 514(4), Cr.P.C.

On the request of the learned Special Public Prosecutor. According to him proceedings were not initiated by him but by his learned predecessor 1982. The concluding portion of his report is to the following affect: ' "It is also to be appreciated that had there been any person other than an Advocate as a surety for accused he could take such a long time in fulfilling his commitment. That being the position is it not a fact that Mr. Lodhi by virtue of his being an Advocate, has misused rather abused his status as an Advocate." There is no denial by the learned Special Judge of having made a complaint against the petitioner to the Punjab Bar Council for proceeding against him.

5. In this view of the matter, the apprehension entertained by the petitioner of not getting fair trial is not without any substance. Accordingly, it would be expedient and in the interest of -justice t transfer the proceedings from the Court of Rao Iqbal Ahmad Khan to that of Mr. Ausaf Ali Khan, Senior Special Judge, Anti-Corruption. I order accordingly. The transferee Court shall proceed in accordance with law.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch