1. This is a Complaint under section 53 1) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969.
2. The allegations in the Complaint are at the complainant, who was an employee of the respondents, was maltreated by the Fore man of the respondents and thereafter served with a charge sheet and subsequently dismissed from service. As regards the maltreatment, the complainant states that he had lodged the report with the police. With respect to his dismissal of an employee would amount to unfair labour practice only if he proposes to become, or persuades any other person to become a member or officer of a Trade Union, or participate in the membership, formation or activities of a Trade Union, as provided in clause (d) of section 15. In the present case, there is no allegation in the complaint that the applicant was dismissed from service because of his Trade Union activities.
3. Therefore, the Complaint appears to have been misconceived. The respondent-Union have pleaded, inter alia, that the, and is accordingly dismissed. The proper remedy for the appli--cant would be to seek the relief by making an, application underinterim injunction, which is pending before the Sind Labour section 34 of the I.R.O., 1969, or under the provisions of the Appellate Tribunal. The Representative for the applicants, while Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.