Pakistan Case Law← Search
1987 SCMR 2102

QAMAR UD DIN vs S.H.O., POLICE STATION, SADDAR KASUR

Citation1987 SCMR 2102
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.299 of 1987 W.P. No.1508 of 1987
Date1987-07-26
Judge(s)Shafi-ur-Rehman, Saad Saood Jan
ResultPetition dismissed

SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--The petitioner is the father of Mst. Anwar Bibi who is admittedly a major. On 28-10-1986 she married one Sohrab Khan. The petitioner alleges that on 28-10-1986 she was married to one Muhammad Rashid and as such her subsequent nikah with Sohrab Khan was void.

He further alleges that she is at present living with Sohrab Khan in adultery.

2. The petitioner moved the High Court for the issuance of a direction to the local police for the registration of a case under the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance, 1979 against Sohrab Khan, but his petition was dismissed. He now seeks leave to appeal from the order of the High Court.

3. It appears that Sohrab Khan had earlier applied to the High Court for the issuance of writ of habeas corpus for the release of Mst. Anwar Bibi from the allegedly illegal custody of the petitioner.

During the hearing of the petition she appeared in Court and denied that she was married to Muhammad Rashid; on the other hand .She stated that she was married to Sohrab Khan. On her request she was allowed to go with Sohrab Khan.

4. It will be noticed that the allegation of the petitioner that his daughter is living in adultery with Sohrab Khan is based on the premises that she was married to Muhammad Rashid prior to her nikah with Sohrab Khan. Mst. Anwar Bibi disputed that she was even married to Muhammad Rashid.

That being so, the rule laid down in the case of Muhammad Azam v. Muhammad Iqbal PLD 1984 S.C. 95 is attracted to this case. Unless her nikah with Muhammad Rashid is established in a Family Court it will not be appropriate to give a direction to the local police to register a case against Sohrab Khan. This petition is accordingly dismissed.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search