' The petitioner Parvaiz Akhtar has moved this petition for bail after arrest under section 497/498, Cr.P.C. In a case registered against him under section 10 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood Ordinance, 1979, under section 14 of the Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance VI of 1979 and under section 506/342, P.P.C. At 'Police Station Saddar, Gujrat, vide F.I.R. No,643, dated 14-10-1986.
2. The, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the witnesses, namely, Muhammad Siddiq, Bashir Ahmed Ch. Rehmat Khan, Haji Barkat Ali, Ch.Jamil Hussain and Ch.Ghulam Sarwar have sworn affidavits against the prosecution and in favour of the petitioner. The learned counsel has placed heavy reliance on these affidavits and has submitted that in view of these affidavits, there is no case against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that the prosecutrix has not at all been medically examined so far. The learned State counsel has not been able to dislodge the petitioner on that score.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that this is a case of further inquiry: Accordingly I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs,20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of A . C. Gujrat. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.