SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--These are four petitions for special leave to appeal from the orders dated 9- 9-1982 of the Federal Service Tribunal.
2. The petitioners were meter readers working under the Executive Engineer (E), Sahiwal. There were allegations against them that they were a party to the theft of electric energy. Departmental proceedings were initiated against them and as a result thereof they were dismissed from service.
They filed appeals before the Executive Engineer but before they could receive a reply from him they challenged the orders of their dismissal from service before the Labour Court. The Labour Court dismissed their petitions for want of jurisdiction. The Executive Engineer returned the appeals on the ground that they lay before the Superintending Engineer. They then lodged the appeals before the Superintending Engineer, who kept the appeals pending for a long time. The petitioner then filed appeals before the Federal Service Tribunal, which dismissed them on the ground of limitation. Later, by identically worded orders, the Superintending Engineer dismissed the appeals.
His order reads as follows:-- "Your appeal has been considered for decision in this office and found unsatisfactory, hence the same is hereby rejected."
The petitioners then again filed appeals before the Federal Service Tribunal from the order of the Superintending Engineer. The departmental representative objected to the competency of the appeals on the plea of res-judicata. The Tribunal rejected this plea and held that the order of the Superintending Engineer gave a fresh cause of action to the petitioners to come to the Tribunal.
However, it dismissed the appeals on the ground that the petitioners' appeals before the Superintending Engineer were barred by time and that there was no justification for the condo nation of the delay. The petitioners have now sought leave to appeal from the orders of the Federal Service Tribubal.
3. It is to be noticed that the Superintending Engineer had not dismissed the appeals of the petitioners on the ground of limitation. The question for consideration is whether the Federal Service Tribunal could on its own take up the bar of limitation when the departmental appellate authority had not chosen to base its orders on this ground. We would accordingly grant leave to appeal to the petitioners.