1. SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--This petition for special leave to appeal is by the vendees-defendants in a pre-emption suit. They were aggrieved by an order of the trial Court extending the date for making the deposit of Zar-e-punjum. The High Court in revisional jurisdiction has declined to interfere with its order.
2. There can be little doubt that under section 22 (4), Pre-emption Act, the trial Court was competent to extend time for making the deposit. See Hidayatullah v. Murad A.I PLD 1972 SC 69. Before making the impugned order the trial Court recorded a finding that sufficient cause existed for granting the extension. This finding does' not suffer from any infirmity. The petition is accordingly dismissed