ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, J.--The petitioners seek leave to appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, dated 17-3-1987, whereby their Civil Revisions bearing Nos. 146-D and 147-D of 1983, were dismissed.
2. Two suits, one by the petitioners for the recovery of Rs.2,800 against the respondents and the other by the respondents against the petitioners for possession of agricultural land, were filed in the Court of Civil Judge, 1st Class, Chishtian. After the contest, the learned Civil Judge, vide his judgment 30-6-1976, dismissed the suit of the petitioners and decreed that of the respondents. The learned Additional District Judge, vide his judgment, dated 9-4-1983, dismissed the appeals of the petitioners and their revisions too were dismissed through the impugned judgment.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners at some length. All the Courts have concurrently non-suited the petitioners and rightly so because it was the petitioners' witness who destroyed their case.
4. Since no question of law of general importance has been raised in these petitions, the same are dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.