Gul Zarin Kiani, J.-Petitioner alongwith his brother, father and two others, are accused of having stolen 20 maunds of wheat lying on the thrashing-floor which belonged to Suleman, complainant, who was tenant of Maqsood, father of the present petitioner. Admittedly, all the accused except the petitioner have been released on bail by the trial Magistrate after arrests.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the case against the petitioner and his other close relatives is the result of the habeas corpus petition moved against Barkat A.I SHO Police Station Hujra Shah Mukeem Tehsil Dipalour. Reference to the records of Criminal Misc : No. 309-H/86 prima facie supports the aforsaid statement. From the orders passed on l9-7-8t> by this Court the contention of the learned counsel for the a cu>ed receives some support. Investigating Officer states that the alleged stoled wheat has already been recovered Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, states that the wheat was purchased from the open market and was planted on the petitioner.
3. Without deeper comments on the merits of the case, I find that the petitioner is entitled to the concession of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the to him on 11-8-1980 is confirmed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.