1. Exemption allowed.
2. Mr. Sardar Muhammad Ishaq has contended that the applicant is a teenager being 17/18 of age, and she is a girl. That the only piece of evidence available against the applicant is her statement which was recorded before the Magistrate u/s 164, Cr.P.C. As a witness. It was further contended that even this statement is self-exculpatory and the applicant has not involved any person including herself.
' Mr. S. Sarfraz Ahmed A.A.-G. Has no objection to the grant of bail to the applicant in view of the above circumstances.
' I have considered the contentions of the learned counsel. It s an admitted position that the F.I.R.
Shows that the age of the applicant will be 17/18 years. She js, therefore, a young girl. That he statement made by her before a First Class Magistrate on 25-8-1987 A vas made in the capacity of a witness and therefore the same could lot be used against her in her trial. Mr. S. Sarfraz Ahmed has also conceded to the grant of bail to the applicant.
' In view of the above circumstances I direct that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs,25,000 and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.