' This revision petition under section 13 of the Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960 is directed against the order of the Additional Commissioner (Cons.) Lahore, dated 21-7-1979, whereby he refused to reverse his previous order dated 13-3-1979 passed ex parte making certain adjustments in the khatas of the parties.
2. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the Additional .,ner (Cons.) had unjustifiably withdrawn from them khasra west (4K--10M), class I in exchange for the respondents' No,1177 (4 kanals) Class I. They pray for the restoration of the disputed khasra number to them. The respondents case is that the cisputed khasra No,952 was not owned by the petitioners and has been given to them to make up their deficiency near Abadi Deh: 9M in terms of Class II and as against their previous entitlement of 67K, 10M in terms of that class. They have also been adequately accommodated near Abadi Deh. Their plots have also been decreased from 9 to 6. As regards the disputed khasra number 952, it was not owned by the petitioners and has been rightly given to the respondents in order to make up their deficiency near Abadi Deh. In these circumstances I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order which is upheld and the revision petition dismissed accordingly. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.