Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1987 CLC 827

Mst. NAGHMA BIBI vs MUHAMMAD AKHTAR

Citation1987 CLC 827
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Transfer Appeal No.376-C of 1986
Date1986-10-11
Judge(s)Mian Mahboob Ahmad
ResultSuit transferred.

' This petition under section 25-A of the Family Courts Act, 1964 seeks transfer of the suit for restitution of conjugal rights titled Muhammad Akhtar v. Mst. Naghma Bibi from the Court of Mr. Mumtaz Munawar Niazi, Judge Family Court, Gujrat to the Court of Mr. Ali Dastgir Syed, Judge Family Court, Lahore before whom the petitioners' suit against the respondent for dissolution of marriage is pending.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was married with the respondent at Lahore to which place she had to revert after falling out with the respondent and had, therefore, instituted the suit for dissolution of marriage before the Judge Family Court, Lahore, but the respondent in order to harass the petitioner has filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights at Gujrat.

3. The learned counsel further contends that in the two suits similar questions of law and facts are likely to arise and, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings that the two suits are tried by one and the same Court.

4. The learned counsel has lastly contended that Mst. Naghma Bibi is a Pardanashin Lady and it will be highly inconvenient for her to go to Gujrat on each date of hearing to defend herself there, whereas no extra inconvenience will be suffered by the respondent if his case is transferred to Lahore since he in any case has to come to Lahore to appear in the suit filed against him, by the petitioners, he has filed no transfer application for the transfer of the said suit.

5. The respondent has not appeared to contest this petition and has been proceeded against ex parte.

6. The contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner are going unrebutted. Otherwise also the contentions raised have force and find support from the precedent case law on the subject of transfer of cases arising under the Family Courts Act.

7. In view of the foregoing discussion, allowing this petition I direct that suit for restitution of conjugal rights titled Muhammad Akhtar v. Mst. Naghma Bibi pending in the Court of Mr. Mumtaz Munawar Niazi, Judge Family Court Gujrat be withdrawn from that Court and entrusted to the Court of Mr. Ali Dastgir Syed, Judge Family Court, Lahore for adjudication in accordance with law.

8. Since the respondent has not appeared to contest this petition, there will be no order as to costs.

9. Parties shall appear before the transferee Court in the suit for restitution of conjugal rights as well on 27-10-1986 the date already fixed in the suit for dissolution of marriage.

10. The Court at Gujrat from which the suit has been withdrawn shall ensure that the record of the case reaches the transferee Court well in advance of the date fixed above.

11. The transferee Court shall also ensure that the two suits are fixed on the same dates of hearing so that no extra inconvenience is caused to the respondent.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch