S.A. NUSRAT, J.--The deceased Chanda Begum, applied for the eviction of the petitioner from the disputed residential premises on the grounds of default, personal bona fide need and nuisance. It was deposed by the husband of the applicant /respondent in the trial Court that the premises was required by the respondent /landlady for the occupation of her family which consisted of her husband, three sons and three daughters, all of whom were adults. It was further stated that two of the sons had completed their education and their marriages had to be arranged. Chanda Begum having died during the proceedings and her legal heirs were brought on the record and the learned Rent Controller allowed the application of eviction by order dated 1-9-1983 only on the ground of personal requirement. Petitioner's First Rent Appeal from the order of the Rent Controller having failed, leave to appeal is now sought from the judgment of the learned High Court.
2. We heard the learned counsel and have gone through the impugned judgment. The finding on the question of personal bona fide requirement of the respondents has been affirmed by the learned Judge in the High Court on the basis of evidence on the record. The decision in the case rests on findings of fact and there is no room for further re-appraisal of evidence at this stage. No question of law is raised in the petition, which merits no consideration. The same is dismissed accordingly. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.