Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1987 SCMR 2058

MACHHIA vs Mst. PANAN

Citation1987 SCMR 2058
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.851 of 1980 Civil Revision No.879/D of
Date1987-07-29
Judge(s)Shafi-ur-Rehman, Saad Saood Jan
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--The petitioner is the husband of the respondent. In 1958, just a month before their Nikah, a mutation was attested by the local revenue authorities showing that the petitioner had made a gift of about 230 Kanals of agricultural land in favour of the respondent. Some thirteen years later there was an estrangement between the spouses, perhaps, for the reason that the petitioner had taken a second wife. However, that may be in 1971 he filed a suit to challenge the validity of the gift alleging that he had neither made the gift nor parted with the possession of the land. The trial Court decreed the suit but on appeal by the respondent, the District Judge held that the petitioner had made a valid gift in favour of the respondent. Accordingly, he accepted the appeal and dismissed the suit. The High Court in revisional jurisdiction declined to interfere with the finding of the learned District Judge. The petitioner now seeks leave to appeal from this Court,

2. It is to be noticed that the petitioner had not only himself reported the gift to the Patwari but that he was also present at the time of the attestation of mutation. As regards the transfer of possession, the land was being tilled by two tenants. They appeared at the trial and stated that they were tenants under the respondent. It is also to be noticed that the respondent was an illiterate woman who did not herself manage her property. In the circumstances, even if it be assumed that the land was being tilled by or through the petitioner it will not be wrong to infer that he was doing so on behalf of his wife, particularly so when he had himself got the mutation attested and had remained silent for about thirteen years till he got married again.

3. It will thus, appear that the finding of the learned District Judge that the petitioner had made a valid gift in favour of the respondent does not suffer from any infirmity. The High Court, therefore, very properly refused to interfere with it. This petition is without any merit and is hereby dismissed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch