1. MUHAMMAD ZAHOORUL HAQ, J.--The petitioner has felt aggrieved against the general instructions issued by the respondent in respect of its employees. We do not find any justification to interfere at this stage with the general instructions issued by an employer for A the guidance of its employees if there is any action taken by the respondent against the petitioner or any other employee in his individual capacity, then the petitioner or the aggrieved employee may seek his remedy, whatever that may be.
2. The petitioner has also felt aggrieved against certain charge-- sheets which have been issued to certain employees of the respondents where an action under Sind Essential Services (Maintenance) Act of 1958 is threatened. The issue of mere charge-sheet is hardly a matter which should be brought to this Court for the purpose of relief The employees who have been issued charge-sheets are required to submit their replies and they should do so. We are sure that the respondent B will give due regard to the answers submitted by the employees and due inquiry will be held into the charges. At the moment there is hardly any justification for the petitioner to challenge the issue of these charge-sheets. If eventually action is finally taken by the respondent against the employees and they have no other adequate remedy available, then alone they can invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Consequently, this petition is not found to be sustainable and is hereby dismissed in limine.