1. AWARD On 3rd July 1972 the above named applicant filed an application under section 25-A of I. R. O. as amended against the, above-named respondents in this Court.
2. In his application, the applicant submitted that in 1963, he joined the respondents as Supervisor on monthly salary of its. 250.00 and was a permanent worker. On 30th April 1972, he lost his services as a consequence to ouster from service without show-cause notice, charge-sheet, domestic enquiry and payment of all legal dues. According to him such type of ouster had no recognition in law. That on 12th May 1972, the applicant orally as well as in writing approached the respondents for re- instatement and restoration of service but it produced no result. He, therefore, prayed for declaration that ouster of the applicant from service was malicious and illegal and was not operative in law and hence he was entitled to re-instatement and restoration with full back benefits. His alternate prayer was for payment of all legal dues according to full entitlement.
3. The respondents remained absent in spite of service. Hence on 9th October 1912, an ex marts order was, passed against them respondents.
4. The applicant has filed his affidavit in ex parts proof" re-affirming all the averments as made by him in his application.
5. The respondents are ex parse. There is nothing in rebuttal. Hence I have no reason to disbelieve the version of the applicant.
6. Accordingly I allow the application of the applicant and direct the respondants to re-instate him and grant him all the legal dues.