' This is a revision petition filed against the order, dated 1-3-1982 of the learned Commissioner, Hyderabad Division, Hyderabad, whereby he dismissed the time-barred appeal of petitioner in respect of S.No.48 of Deh Gehilpur, taluka Khairpur Nathan Shah.
2. I have heard both the sides. This is a clear case of violation of Land Reforms Laws. Tenant Mazar could not legally sell this land before he came full owner under MLR-115. I will not say anything about S.No.56 area 3-32 Acres 'granted to him under MLR-64, which was also sold away by Mazar in 1969 as it is not in dispute before me. But S.No. 48 measuring 4-00 Acres could not be sold by him in bits and pieces in clear violation of Land Reform Laws. Moreover a document produced by the counsel for the petitioner shows that Mazar is only a proxy but this land is being managed by one Haji Saindino of Mehar, said to be a Tapedar, who appears to be behind all allotments made in favour of Mazar.
3. As the sale of land by Mazar was ab initio illegal, this land stands resumed and should be disposed of afresh in accordance with the policy laid down para. 18 of the Land Reforms Regulation, 1972.