Lehrasap Khan, J.-Mst Sheema petitioner, who was involved in a case under sections 16 and 10 of the Offeree oi Zina (Enforcement of Zina) Ordinance, 1989, arising out of FIR No. 376/19*6, dated li>-9-19*6, registered at Police Station Depalpur, District Okara, has sought to be released on bail.
2. It has been alleged that one Allah Ditta, a co-accused of the petitioner, developed illicit relations with her through the good offices of bis wife Mst. N a seem begum whose parents lived in the neighbourhood of Muhammad Bashir complainant, the husband of the petitioner. On 10-9-1975, the petitioner wa adducted by Allah Ditta and his wife in a car bearing No. GAC 418 for illicit purposes.
3. From the allegations contained in the FIR, as detailed above, no role has been ascribed to ,Mst.
Sheema petitioner who is said to be the abductee in the case. It has not bean alleged in the FIR that she was liable for zina punishable under section r0(2) of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hauood) Ordnance, 1979.
4. It has, however, been contended on behalf of the State that Mst. Sheeman being a consenting party to her abduction was guilty of the offence of Zina under section 10(2) ibid. This contention is without any substance. Neither there is ny allegation of the commission ox offence ot Zina against the petitioner in the FIR nor any evidence to that effect has been collected, as transputer from the records ol investigation.
5. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum el Rs.
15. Out) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction ol the A. C, Depalpur.