1. MUHAMMAD` ZAFARULLAH, J.--In an election to a seat in Union Council Mehrajke Tehsil Pasroor, District Sialkot the petitioner obtained 214 votes as against 75 obtained by Malik Latif Ahmad, respondent No. 2. Latif Ahmad, however, challenged the election in a petition before the learned Deputy Commissioner/ Election Tribunal, Sialkot. The Election Tribunal found that one hundred ballot-papers did not contain the identity card numbers. He also found that 31 votes were polled in excess of the votes issued. He consequently found that there had been extensive illegal practices in the conduct of the poll and declared the election void as a whole. The order of the Election Tribunal, dated 25-6-1984 has been assailed in the present writ petition.
2. 2.As a matter of calculation even if one, hundred ballot-papers, the counterfoil of which did not contain identity card numbers and the 31 votes polled in excess of the votes issued are excluded from the count of the petitioner he will still have a lead of nine votes over Latif Ahmad respondent.
3. The hundred votes offered cannot however, be discounted as it is now well-settled that the absence of the identity card numbers will not disenfranchise the voters as the instructions regarding the identity cards were only directory and not mandatory. Similarly, the excess votes found in the ballot box can be explained from the proceedings of the election as certain ballot books were used for more than one unit. This by itself cannot amount to a corrupt or illegal practice, what to talk of exensive illegal practice as only 31 In view of the above considerations the orders of the Electiondated 25-6-1984 cannot be sustained.
4. The writ petition is allowed and the impugned orders are declared to be of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs.