Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLD 1986 Karachi 347

THE STATE vs ABDUL WAHID

CitationPLD 1986 Karachi 347
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Suo Motu Revisions Nos. 135 of 1981, (Karachi) and 2 of 1983,
Date1984-10-01
Judge(s)Syed Sajjad Ali Shah
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

1. ' Chapter 6 of Criminal Procedure Code relates to process to compel appearance in the Court. This chapter provides for issue of summons and warrants. These summons and warrants can be issued to any person which would include accused persons as well as witnesses. If purpose cannot be achieved with issue of summons and if attempt is resisted then bailable warrants or non-bailable warrants can also be issued depending on the circumstances. Sections 70 and 71, Cr. P. C. Prescribe mode of service process of summons. Section 90, Cr. P. C. Contemplates issue of warrant in lieu of, or in addition to summons.

2. ' In the instant case suo motu revision has been registered which was taken cognizance of under section 439, Cr. P. C. Notice has been issued to respondent namely Abdul Wahid to show cause as to why his sentence should not be enhanced. Revision is pending in the High Court which is continuation of judicial proceedings. Notice in the circumstances is part of judicial process which has been issued to the respondent to show cause why the sentence should not be enhanced.

3. Respondent is bound to respond to the process of the High Court and if he fails to attend or disobeys, then in order to procure his attendance there is no impediment in the way to issue even coercive process of bailable warrants or non-bailable warrants. Attempt was made to serve notice on the respondent in this case and the report is that he had gone to Jehaad in Afghanistan and is not likely to return. In the peculiar circumstances of this' case the best course will be to issue non- bailable warrants against the respondent without limit of time and further the matter may be kept on dormant file so that whenever respondent is available the revision can be taken up for hearing.

4. In any case High Court has got inherent powers under section 561-A, Cr. P. C. Which provides that nothing in this B Code shall be deemed to limit or affect the inherent power of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under this Code, or to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. The order passed above is, therefore, requisite legal cover. The Court appreciates valuable assistance rendered by Mr. S. Murtaza Hussain as well as Mr. Ashraf Tanoli, Advocates.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch