Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1986 SCMR 708

THE PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN And Others vs Brig. (Rtd.) ABDUL RASHID

Citation1986 SCMR 708
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 326/11of 1984 Appeal No. 111(R) of 1984
Date1986-01-13
Judge(s)Mian Burhanuddin Khan, Muhammad Afzal Zullah
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, J.--In this petition, among others the following points have been raised for determination before this Court (a) whether the finding of the Service Tribunal to the effect that a civil servant proceeding on leave with pay shall be entitled to get full pay during leave sanctioned for the post as raised, from time to time, on account of increment and revision of pay scales by enforcement of certain scheme, (b) whether the learned Tribunal is competent, to hold that Fundamental Rule 17 and Revised Leave Rules--1980 have been overridden by para. 27 of the scheme of Basic Pay Scales and Fringe Benefits of the Civil Employees of the Federal Government of 1983; (c) whether section 17 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973 covers the determination of the leave pay and as such a civil servant on leave with pay, is entitled to the pay sanctioned for a pose under section 17; and (d) whether sub-clauses (a) and (b) in rule 32 of Revised Leave Rules, 1980, admit of any ambiguity so that its literal construction tends to lead to repugnancy to good sense and the Service Tribunal was justified to construe the same to give them extended meaning so as to give benefit of the enhancement of pay to a civil servant who is on leave.

2. Contention of the learned counsel is that the learned Service Tribunal has in fact struck down the relevant rule which was beyond its jurisdiction and the interpretation /construction put by the learned Service Tribunal has rendered the entire rule 32 of the Revised Leave Rubs, 1980 nugatory/and whether such interpretation/construction is permissible under the law and whether the distinction drawn by the learned Service Tribunal regarding the phrase in accordance with the rules and used in section 17 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973 that it does not mean "subject to rules" is not too fine to stand judicial scrutiny.

3. The points raised are of legal importance. We, therefore, grant leave to consider the same. The appeal shall be heard on the present record with liberty to file additional documents, if so desired.

Application for stay to continue, was not contested.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch