Pakistan Case Law← Search
1986 PLC 1126

SUBHAN DIN vs DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE

Citation1986 PLC 1126
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi
ResultAppeal accepted

The decision, dated 17-3-1985 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No.3, Lahore at Ferozewala has been challenged, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant for his re-instatement in service was dismissed in limine on the ground that the second grievance notice was time-barred.

2. The earlier grievance petition was dismissed for the reasons that the grievance notice was invalid having been given by the lawyer and not by the appellant. On the same day on which the petition was dismissed the appellant sent grievance notice with his own signatures and within time brought the grievance petition. He had filed alongwith the grievance petition an application for condonation of delay duly supported by an affidavit. If the learned lower Court was not prepared to accept the affidavit, it should have given opportunity to the appellant to produce evidence to prove the ground given for condonation. The ruling of the Supreme Court reported in PLD 1980 SC 80 was a judgment in personum and could be in the knowledge of the parties to it only. Unlike codified law the decisions are not notified in the Gazette so there is no presumption that every body knows them. As soon as the appellant learnt from the previous decision of the learned lower Court that the previous grievance notice was invalid, he without loss of time sent fresh notice himself on the same day. The petition for condonation of delay, therefore, was worth consideration and it cannot be said that the grievance petition did not disclose any cause of grievance. The order of dismissal of the petition in limine, therefore, is not maintainable.

3. As a result of what has been observed above, the appeal is accepted and setting aside the impugned decision of the learned lower Court, the case is remanded with the direction that after inviting written statement from the respondent and affording proper opportunity B to both the parties to produce evidence the point of limitation be decided afresh. If the grievance notice is found to be within time, the case be decided on merit.

A. E.

Appeal accepted

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search