This Criminal Appeal arises from the judgment of learned Magistrate, Section 30, Chiniot, whereby he on 29-9-1984 convicted Shano and Falak Sher appellants under section 307/34, P.P.C. And sentenced them to five years' R.I. And a fine of Rs.5,000 in default thereof six months' R.I.
2. The learned counsel while conceding the allegations that Falak Sher had caught hold of the victim Muhammad P.W. 2 and Shano appellant had caused him injury in the abdomen, the learned counsel has challenged the nature of the offence. He maintained that since the injury caused by Shanoo appellant was found simple, therefore, the appellants could not have been convicted under section 307/34, P.P.C.
Consequently the learned counsel for the State has supported the judgment of the trial Court.
3. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I feel inclined to agree with the learned counsel for the appellants inasmuch as I find that the injury allegedly caused by Shanoo has been declared simple. The mere fact that the injury was inflicted on the vital part of the body would not make it a case of murderous assault punishable under section 307/34, P.P.C. That being the position the conviction of the appellants under section A 307/34, P.P.C., is set aside and instead they are convicted under section 324/34, P.P.C., and sentenced to two years' R.I. And a fine of Rs.5,000 in default thereof six months' R.I. Each. The fine when recovered be paid to Muhammad P.W. 2 (injured witness) as compensation.