ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.--The petitioners seek review of the order of this Court, dated 24-3-1981, dismissing their Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 962 of 1976.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that when the aforementioned petition was heard on 24-3-1981. It was, in fact accepted and leave was granted. He pointed out from the notes recorded on the cover of the brief that he had even deposited the security. He also pointed out that the facts mentioned in the impugned order had no relevance to the facts of the case in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 962 of 1976. He urged that -due to some mistake this order, which was probably recorded in some other case, was attached with the file of Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 962 of 1976.
3. We have carefully considered the matter and feel that there is force in the aforementioned submissions. We, therefore, allow the review and direct that the main petition (Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 962 of 1976) be fixed for hearing on a date to be fixed by the office.
Office is directed to trace the earlier order granting leave in this case.