This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of learned Special Judge (Central), Anti-Corruption, Lahore whereby he on 22-4-1981 convicted Raheel Sajid appellant under section 420/468, P.P.C.
And sentenced him to two years' R.I. And a fine of Rs. 6,000 in default thereof to further R.I. For 4 months.
2. The learned counsel has argued the case on merits. Since after hearing the learned counsel I feel inclined to set aside the conviction and send back the case to the trial Court because of illegality in recording of the statement of the accused under section 342/364, Cr.P.C. I need not enter into the merits of the case. I find that the trial Court after having recorded the statement of the accused under section 342, Cr.P.C. On 1-4-1981 did not care to give certificate to the effect that examination of the accused was taken in its presence and hearing and that the record contained full and true account of the statement made by the accused. This, to my mind, is not 'a mere irregularity but clear illegality because the mandatory requirement has not be some With That being the position, there is no option but to set aside to conviction and sentence of the appellant and send back the case to the trial Court for retrial from the stage of recording of the statement of the accused. The trial Court shall record the statement of the accuse person again and give requisite certificate thereon and then decided the case according to law. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.