The order, dated 2-4-1985 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 9, Multan, whereby the operation of the order, dated 26-3-1985 was suspended, is reported to be of no legal effect. Vide order, dated 26-3-1985 the grievance petition of the petitioner was accepted ex parte and he was directed to be re-instated in service. The respondents made an application for setting aside the ex parte decision, dated 26-3-1985. The impugned order, dated 2-4-1985 was ad interim and not final as the petitioner was not heard. The petitioner instead of coming to this Court should have asked the learned lower Court to vacate the same. It is argued that the learned Presiding Officer of Punjab Labour Court No. 9, Multan is on special duty and thus is not functioning at Multan, but this is no ground for challenging an order which has not yet gained finality. Needless to say that only that order can be challenged in revision which cannot be vacated by the authority passing it.
2. As a result, the revision having no force is dismissed in limine, but Court No. 8, Bahawalpur is authorised to dispose of any application for vacation of order, dated 2-4-1985 if the petitioner happens to move for it.
E. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.