The petitioner alongwith three others stands charged with the murder of Khadim Hussain deceased and for murderously assaulting Inayat Bibi and Mansha on 17-5-1985 with spear and a hatchet. The petitioner was armed with a hatchet and is alleged to have caused injury on the hand of the deceased.
2. Bail is pleaded on the ground that the injury attributed to Nazir Ahmed petitioner is simple in nature and further that he is not directly involved with the motive and further that the nature of the injury suggests that it was not caused with hatchet.
3. Learned counsel for the State and the complainant have opposed the application. According to them the petitioner is vicariously liable because he actively participated in the occurrence.
4. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. And is alleged to hay caused a hatchet injury to the deceased. The contentions that he had no direct motive for the crime and further that the injury found on the hand of the deceased was not characteristic of hatchet essentiall A relate to the merits of the case which cannot be gone into at this stage. The petitioner is implicated by two injured eye-witnesses in the offence.
In these circumstances, I do not consider him entitled to bail and accordingly dismiss his application. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.