1. ORDER ore, The applicant is facing trial under section 307/34, P.P.C. Wherein it has been alleged that on 21- 7 1986 the complainant had seen the present applicant selling the heroin in front of his house and the complainant asked him not to do so but the applicant abused the: complainant and at about 7-30 p.m. He alongwith three persons cam( there and started firing at the complainant. The complainant jumped over from the place and saved his life. At that time a vehicle of Eagle Squad also appeared at the scene and they arrested the present applicant and Fazal Qadir and the remaining two persons ran away from the place of incident. The learned counsel for the applicant has Stated that the applicant was not selling the heroin and no case of that nature has been registered against him. He 'has further stated that at the time when the applicari was apprehended, no arm was recovered by the police from the applicani and the fire-arm was recovered from co-accused Fazal Qadir. In thes( circumstances, the applicant is entitled to bail. In fact the applicant is the aggrieved person. He was prevented by the complainant from selling the heroin. He had a motive in bringing the co-accused to the place of incident. The co-accused made indiscriminate firing on the complainant with fire-arm. In these circumstances, prima facie, the vicarcious liability for the offence is attributed to the present applicant. He is not entitled to bail. Th( application is rejected. Es revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.